115
In the case of juvenile offenders, if the court was of opinion that the offender should not be sent to a reformatory, he might order him whipping.
If corporal punishment were to be inflicted for the offences enumerated under headings 2, 5, 6, 7, it would be introducing a new feature into our system.
Should His Excellency the Officer Administering the Government wish it, I would submit an Ordinance embodying the suggestions of the Gaol Commission and some suggestions of the Chief Justice.
Vaughan 87 Edw. J. Ackroyd, New Territories, July 21st 1886.
Earnings, stealing, or robbery can now be punished with whipping if any personal violence be used. Robbery with violence is now punished with whipping under Ordinance 3 of 1881.
I think stealing things from women or children might be punished by whipping, and also indecent assaults. This latter offence was punished with whipping Section 7 of Ordinance 1 of 1875.
The other suggestions contained in this letter would be met by repealing Ordinance 3 of 1881 and re-enacting it on a second conviction under certain conditions.
Acting Attorney General
115
case of juvenile offenders was of opinion that the offender should not be sent to a reformatory he might order him whipping.
a
If corporal punishment were to be inflicted for the offences
enumerated
under headings 2, 5,6,7, it would be
introducing a
our systeur.
re-enacting 12 of 1865.
Should His Excellency the Officer Administering the Governmen
Government wish
it I would submit au Ordinance
embodying
the
engqutions of the Gaol Commission and some enggestions of the Chief Justice,
Vaigue 87 Edw. J. Ackroyd
New
perishment into
can now be
July 21h 1886.
Earring seatching
prunished with whipping if any personal violence be used. Robbery
is now
with violence.
punished with whipping under
Ordinance 3 of 1881.
I think matching things from
women or children might be punished by whipping and ales indecent assaults,
offence was puncished
this latter offence
हु
whipping Section 7 of Ordinance of 1 175.
The other suggestions contained in this letter would be met by repealing Ordinance 3 of 1881 and
re-enacting
on a second conviction under
Acting Attorney General
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.